Vanguard Magazine

Vanguard Oct Nov 2017

Preserving capacity, General Tom Lawson, Chief of the Defence Staff, Keys to Canadian SAR

Issue link: http://vanguardcanada.uberflip.com/i/890230

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 11 of 47

s suBmarIne 12 OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2017 www.vanguardcanada.com unconventIonaL - conventIonaL suBmarIne by norman Jolin THE QUEST FOR THE t he recently released Canadian Defence Policy entitled "Strong, Secure and Engaged" reiterated the need for Canada's Navy to be comprised of a balanced fleet of plat- forms which includes submarines. How- ever, while it did not specifically mention a submarine replacement project, it did commit to modernizing the four Victoria- class submarines. Clearly, in this policy, the Government of Canada has acknowledged the unique qualities and options a submarine capabil- ity brings to the defence of the nation, and the pressing need to maintain this capabil- ity. The question then becomes when will a replacement project for these submarines be announced? victoria-class The Victoria-class are now at mid-life and concerns being voiced over delays in standing up a replacement project are fully understandable. However, when one stands back and looks at submarines through a strategic Canadian perspective, then the current policy of Victoria-class modernization makes some sense. These submarines have significant potential and more importantly, the future submarine that Canada needs does not currently ex- ist. Let me explain. Firstly, some background. The four 2400 ton Victoria-class conventionally powered (diesel-electric) submarines were purchased used from the UK in the late 1990s under the aegis of what was known as the Submarine Capability Life Exten- sion project. A gap-filler vice replacement for the 2200 ton Oberon-class submarines that Canada was then operating on were approaching the end of their service lives. To some this may seem to be semantics; it is not. Canada needed to maintain an ocean-going submarine capability, but the fiscal realities of the Chretien govern- ment's deficit reduction programme pre- cluded the funding of a submarine replace- ment project at that time. For a submarine capability to survive, Canada had to purchase a stop-gap solu- tion with very limited resources, which it did by capitalizing on the UK decision to

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of Vanguard Magazine - Vanguard Oct Nov 2017